Cortázar's experiment: will you hop the squares in the order he drew them, or not?
Text and illustrations produced by the pipeline
In front of a window at a psychiatric hospital, Horacio Oliveira crouches on the ground, drawing a hopscotch grid in chalk, square by square: one, two, and at the top a square marked Heaven. He stands, takes a step toward the window, and stops. The book ends there, without telling you whether he jumps. A novel this long, willing to let its ending hang on that one suspended second — that is exactly how it is written.
Hopscotch (Rayuela in the original Spanish) was first published in Buenos Aires in 1963, a novel by the Argentine writer Julio Cortázar. Alongside the work of García Márquez, Vargas Llosa, and Fuentes, it helped establish the Latin American Boom's place on the world literary stage. It is remembered not for how movingly it tells its story, but because it refuses, at a structural level, to let your eyes move in order.
The book opens with a Table of Instructions that spells out at least two official ways to read it: straight through, chapter one to chapter fifty-six, or by hopping through the author's specified sequence, weaving in a whole set of expendable chapters along the way. So the same book in your hands and in someone else's hands can end up being two different books. The trick went on to shape an entire generation of postmodern fiction.
The novel comes in two parts. The first, From the Other Side, is set in Paris. Oliveira, an Argentine intellectual living there in exile, runs with a circle of bohemian friends who call themselves the Serpent Club, people who gather at night in a courtyard apartment to drink and to talk philosophy and jazz until dawn. The woman in his life is La Maga, a Uruguayan with little formal education and no grounding in philosophy, who can still cut through a whole night of talk with a single intuitive line. Their relationship runs like two different ways of living locked together, always a step from dislocating.
This brings us back to the opening scene: the chalk grid on the ground, Heaven written in the top square. The linear reading stops at chapter fifty-six, with Oliveira standing at the hospital window, the grid finished, taking a step toward it. The book does not say whether he jumps, or what happens if he does. It is an ending that refuses to answer you, and that refusal is Cortázar at his most arrogant: he has no intention of closing that one suspended second on your behalf.
I am not going to invent a clean he-jumped or he-didn't ending for him, because the book never meant to write one. That is what separates it from almost every other novel on the shelf: it hands the entire second of decision back to you.
A guide like this only maps the terrain; the terrain itself is something else. Reading the book yourself is the only way to catch what Cortázar is actually doing. First, the bohemian rhythm of the thing, jazz records drifting on into distraction, philosophy talked out until dawn, only comes through in the breathing of the sentences themselves; it cannot be summarized. Second, the invented lovers' language Cortázar builds for Oliveira and La Maga, half nonsense and half incantation, only works once you read it in the moment it happens. Third, the act of hopscotching itself: the first time you actually pick up this thick book and dare to jump through it by his grid, the illicit thrill of it lives in your body, not your head. Finish the book and you will know what it means for a writer to make the reader his accomplice.
Before the guide was written, this book got a visual foundation — every illustration you just read grew out of it.
The second part, From This Side, moves to Buenos Aires. His old friend Traveler and Traveler's wife, Talita, work first at a circus and then at a psychiatric hospital, and Oliveira, back in the city for reasons even he can hardly account for, runs into them. The unspoken current running among the three of them is the Paris story echoing on another continent. The whole novel keeps grinding between these pairs: Paris against Buenos Aires, the intellectual endlessly interrogating himself against the woman who simply lives by instinct, dazzling talk against squalor in the street.
La Maga has an infant son, Rocamadour, boarded out in her small room. One night the Serpent Club gathers as usual: philosophy as usual, jazz as usual, breaking up at dawn as usual. In the next room the baby is running a fever. No one hears him.
When the door opens at daybreak, Oliveira stands there and goes cold. It is the heaviest blow in the whole book. La Maga does not cry and does not confront him. She simply vanishes, as if quietly erased from the Paris pavement. Her leaving without a word ends the relationship more completely than any fight could have. From that night on, Oliveira drifts through the streets of Paris carrying a guilt he can never wash off, and the question of whether he missed the way she lived, whether he failed her kind of life, follows him for the rest of his days.
Oliveira gets pulled into an almost absurd rescue. Trying to help a homeless old woman, he and a neighbor lay a plank across the courtyard between their two apartment windows, three floors up, and pass things across it: a bag of groceries, an old umbrella, a tube of toothpaste. Ridiculous, dangerous, pointless, and it happens anyway. Afterward he is arrested for disturbing the peace and put out of France on a deportation order.
This passage shows Cortázar at his sharpest: he uses something close to slapstick to back a man into a corner with nowhere left to go. Oliveira has spent his life gazing up at the high shelves of philosophy and art, and what actually happens to him always wears the face of a street clown.
Back home, Oliveira runs straight into Traveler, an old friend who worked the trapeze act at a circus before taking a job at a psychiatric hospital. The two men function like a controlled experiment: Traveler is the version of Oliveira that never went to Paris. Traveler's wife, Talita, was his assistant at the circus and now handles odd pharmacy work at the hospital. The moment Oliveira looks at her, La Maga's shadow falls over her without his even meaning it to.
Cortázar plays this hand with real malice: he lays it out plainly, and Oliveira knows exactly what he is doing, too. The feeling that crosses a line leaves an invisible film of mold growing between him and his old friend, and still he cannot let it go. Talita becomes La Maga's mirror image, and he can neither pull back nor step forward, suspended like the window frame he stands at.
At the hospital, the Paris bridge over the courtyard plays out again. Talita is ordered to walk a narrow plank across the courtyard between two buildings, carrying medicine and small supplies back and forth. Oliveira watches from a window on the other side, and Paris at night and Buenos Aires in daylight fold into a single scene in his eyes.
Same posture, same sway, the same danger of being stranded three floors up, except this time it has nothing to do with saving a homeless old woman. Setting the two bridges side by side is what Cortázar actually wants you to see: there are moments when a person keeps sending himself back to the middle of the same narrow plank, without ever choosing to.
Slice the book crosswise and it can be read out of order; slice it lengthwise and it has two separate leading pairs. None of this is showing off. Cortázar is doing one specific thing: refusing to let any single sequence of events count as the correct one. The novel is an object before it is a story, a hopscotch grid drawn on the ground, and how you hold it in your hands decides which book you end up with. A whole generation of postmodern novelists learned this move from him, Calvino and Nabokov's literary heirs among them.
The Serpent Club can sit for three hours turning over a single clause of Hegel, and then La Maga walks in and one line strips all that talk bare. It is the sharpest cut in the whole book. Cortázar makes you feel something directly: certain truths do not need a philosophy degree, and instinct can get there faster than the mind. What makes Oliveira pitiable is that he has known this his entire life and never once learns it. He can talk his way through anything, except reaching out, at the one moment it mattered, for a feverish baby.
So the book is about much more than a romance across borders. It names a specific twentieth-century affliction of the intellectual: a whole universe inside the head and nothing at all in the hand. The Paris he thought would solve everything is the Paris that expels him, and the homecoming he thought would restore him leaves him more lost than before. A reader today, three hours deep in a feed and still unable to say what he wants for dinner, will find this book a mirror.